You are currently browsing the monthly archive for October 2009.

I’ve persuaded all but four of the little swine to go through.  They saw the error of their ways.  The four standouts have no idea how much trouble they’re in …

I’ve just spent all morning setting up an email mailing list for our Autumn/Winter newsletter, and of the 69 newsletters and enclosures I sent off, fifteen have bounced straight back.

Yours, through the tears,

M.

Remember, back in the summer, I went off to Penrith to give a talk to the Romantic Novelists Association at their annual conference?

Well, you might like to read this sometime … Crazy Like a Fox.

It’s an abridged version of the talk I gave.  It comes, however, with a warning.  ‘Abridged’ only means it’s shorter than it was.  It doesn’t mean it’s short.  It’s only ’short’ if you’re comparing it to – say – “Gone with the Wind” – which I wouldn’t.

Think ‘De Profundis‘, only more cheerful.

The Shepley Engineers apprentices are doing WONDERFUL things with ironwork in the garden here at the Chase …

As well as our gorgeous garden arch:

Shepley 10

They’ve also refurbished (ie: almost completely rebuilt) the steps to the workshop in the rear courtyard:

Shepley6

AND … they’re in the process of putting gates on the old storehouse in the vegetable garden …

Shepley gate

If we get much posher, we’re going to start charging people to come in and admire us …

And in today’s post …

Snap!

We’re think about matching ensembles …

This arrived in the post this morning …

CWY

Oh my dear life.   They MUST have the wrong person …

LATER IN THE DAY:

This day just got stranger.  I’ve been asked to be one of three judges of The Romantic Novel of the Year award.

That settles it.  I’ve slipped into an alternate universe again …

Is there ANYONE out there who can identify THIS baby garment:

weird baby thing 2

weird baby thing 5

If it’s any help at all, it measures about 18 inches from side to side as laid out in the photo, and around 9 inches from ’shoulder’ to hem.  The ‘arms’ appear to have been set in upside down and those bizarre slits in what should be the shoulders are just plain strange.

It belongs to a friend of the Centre and comes from a very, very old house.  She has more than one of them – so the design is deliberate, not a mistake.

The only suggestion I’ve had so far that makes some sort of sense is that we’re looking at it the wrong way up, and that those sleeves are in fact, for little baby legs and it’s some sort of nappy job … but it’s a very fragile thing – and was never  robust, being (beautifully) made from very fine cotton lawn.  Age estimate – early Victorian?  Possibly late Georgian?

Any and all suggestions gratefully received.

We live on jumble.  Nay, we positively THRIVE on the stuff – each new delivery is greeted with little squeaks of joy as Gretchen and I try to beat each other to best bits …

And we get some jolly interesting stuff, too … but sometimes, the back story of how we ended up with an unwanted gizmo is more interesting than the gizmo itself.

Take the bio-feedback machine (list price over £100) designed to help you lower your stress levels and therefore blood pressure by controlling your respiration rate.  Virtually brand new, used once, perfect working condition, with all necessary accessories.

It’s a well-regarded and proven way of reducing hypertension without drugs.

So – why did we end up with it?  We asked the donor that very question as she was sitting in the kitchen clutching a mug of tea.  Her reply:

“I didn’t have the patience to use it.”